BIBLIO is the largest independent book marketplace in the world, with over 100 million books.

Skip to content

Can Construction Grammar Be Proven Wrong? (Elements in Construction Grammar)

Can Construction Grammar Be Proven Wrong? (Elements in Construction Grammar)

Can Construction Grammar Be Proven Wrong? (Elements in Construction Grammar)
Stock photo: cover may vary

Can Construction Grammar Be Proven Wrong? (Elements in Construction Grammar) Papeback -

by Bert Cappelle

Add to wish list
  • New
New

Description

Cambridge University Press CUP , . Papeback. New.
Ask the seller a question Add to wish list
A$49.74
A$5.85 Delivery within USA
Standard delivery: 9 to 14 days
More delivery options
Ships from Cold Books (New York, United States)

Details

  • Title Can Construction Grammar Be Proven Wrong? (Elements in Construction Grammar)
  • Author Bert Cappelle
  • Binding Papeback
  • Condition New
  • Pages 82
  • Volumes 1
  • Language ENG
  • Publisher Cambridge University Press CUP
  • Publication date
  • Features Bibliography
  • Bookseller's Inventory # 6399013129
  • ISBN 9781009343206 / 1009343203
  • Weight 0.27 lbs (0.12 kg)
  • Dimensions 9 x 6 x 0.17 in (22.86 x 15.24 x 0.43 cm)
  • Category Language Arts / Linguistics / Literacy
  • Library of Congress subjects Construction grammar
  • Library of Congress Catalogue Number 2023053601
  • Dewey Decimal Code 415.018
  • Quantity available 4

About Cold Books New York, United States

Biblio member since 2012

Terms of Sale: 30 day return guarantee, with full refund including shipping costs for up to 30 days after delivery if an item arrives misdescribed or damaged.

Browse books from Cold Books

Reader reviews for Can Construction Grammar Be Proven Wrong? (Elements in Construction Grammar)

From the publisher

Construction Grammar has gained prominence in linguistics, owing its popularity to its inclusive approach that considers language units of varying sizes and generality as potential constructions - mentally stored form-function units. This Element serves as a cautionary note against complacency and dogmatism. It emphasizes the enduring importance of falsifiability as a criterion for scientific hypotheses and theories. Can every postulated construction, in principle, be empirically demonstrated not to exist? As a case study, the author examines the schematic English transitive verb-particle construction, which defies experimental verification. He argues that we can still reject its non-existence using sound linguistic reasoning. But beyond individual constructions, what could be a crucial test for Construction Grammar itself, one that would falsify it as a theory? In making a proposal for such a test, designed to prove that speakers also exhibit pure-form knowledge, this Element contributes to ongoing discussions about Construction Grammar's theoretical foundations.
tracking-