BIBLIO is the largest independent book marketplace in the world, with over 100 million books.

Skip to content

Logical Structures for Representation of Knowledge and Uncertainty

Logical Structures for Representation of Knowledge and Uncertainty

Logical Structures for Representation of Knowledge and Uncertainty Hardback - 1998

by Ellen Hisdal

Add to wish list
  • New
  • Hardback
New

Description

Hardcover. New. New Book; Fast Shipping from UK; Not signed; Not First Edition; N/A
Ask the seller a question Add to wish list
A$196.65
A$15.26 Delivery to USA
Standard delivery: 7 to 12 days
More delivery options
Ships from Ria Christie Collections (Greater London, United Kingdom)

Details

  • Title Logical Structures for Representation of Knowledge and Uncertainty
  • Author Ellen Hisdal
  • Binding Hardback
  • Edition 1st
  • Condition New
  • Pages 420
  • Volumes 1
  • Language ENG
  • Publisher Physica-Verlag
  • Publication date 1998-01-15
  • Illustrated Yes
  • Features Illustrated
  • Bookseller's Inventory # ria9783790810561_inp
  • ISBN 9783790810561 / 3790810568
  • Weight 1.78 lbs (0.81 kg)
  • Dimensions 9.21 x 6.14 x 1 in (23.39 x 15.60 x 2.54 cm)
  • Category Computers - General Information
  • Library of Congress Catalogue Number 97039316
  • Dewey Decimal Code 006.332
  • Quantity available 621

About Ria Christie Collections Greater London, United Kingdom

Biblio member since 2014

Hello We are professional online booksellers. We sell mostly new books and textbooks and we do our best to provide a competitive price. We are based in Greater London, UK. We pride ourselves by providing a good customer service throughout, shipping the items quickly and replying to customer queries promptly. Ria Christie Collections

Terms of Sale:

30 day return guarantee, with full refund including original shipping costs for up to 30 days after delivery if an item arrives misdescribed or damaged.

Browse books from Ria Christie Collections

Reader reviews for Logical Structures for Representation of Knowledge and Uncertainty

From the publisher

It is the business of science not to create laws, but to discover them. We do not originate the constitution of our own minds, greatly as it may be in our power to modify their character. And as the laws of the human intellect do not depend upon our will, so the forms of science, of (1. 1) which they constitute the basis, are in all essential regards independent of individual choice. George Boole [10, p. llJ 1. 1 Comparison with Traditional Logic The logic of this book is a probability logic built on top of a yes-no or 2-valued logic. It is divided into two parts, part I: BP Logic, and part II: M Logic. 'BP' stands for 'Bayes Postulate'. This postulate says that in the absence of knowl- edge concerning a probability distribution over a universe or space one should assume 1 a uniform distribution. 2 The M logic of part II does not make use of Bayes postulate or of any other postulates or axioms. It relies exclusively on purely deductive reasoning following from the definition of probabilities. The M logic goes an important step further than the BP logic in that it can distinguish between certain types of information supply sentences which have the same representation in the BP logic as well as in traditional first order logic, although they clearly have different meanings (see example 6. 1. 2; also comments to the Paris-Rome problem of eqs. (1. 8), (1. 9) below).

From the rear cover

To answer questions concerning previously supplied information the book uses a truth table or 'chain set' logic which combines probabilities with truth values (= possibilities of fuzzy set theory). Answers to questions can be 1 (yes); 0 (no); m (a fraction in the case of uncertain information); 0m, m1 or 0m1 (in the case of 'ignorance' or insufficient information). Ignorance (concerning the values of a probability distribution) is differentiated from uncertainty (concerning the occurrence of an outcome). An IF THEN statement is interpreted as specifying a conditional probability value. No predicate calculus is needed in this probability logic which is built on top of a yes-no logic. Quantification sentences are represented as IF THEN sentences with variables. No 'forall' and 'exist' symbols are needed. This simplifies the processing of information. Strange results of first order logic are more reasonable in the chain set logic. E.g., (p->q) AND (p->NOTq), p->NOT p, (p->q)->(p->NOT q), (p->q)- >NOT(p->q), are contradictory or inconsistent statements only in the chain set logic. Depending on the context, two different rules for the updating of probabilities are shown to exist. The first rule applies to the updating of IF THEN information by new IF THEN information. The second rule applies to other cases, including modus ponens updating. It corresponds to the truth table of the AND connective in propositional calculus. Many examples of inferences are given throughout the book.
tracking-