Stock photo: cover may vary
MISQUOTING JESUS Pb - 2007
by EHRMAN,BART
- Used
- fair
- Paperback
Now in paperback, this "New York Times" bestseller explores the mistakes and changes that ancient copyists made to the New Testament that greatly impacted the Bible used today.
A$16.53
A$8.38
Delivery within USA
Standard delivery: 2 to 9 days
More delivery options
Standard delivery: 2 to 9 days
Ships from Book Culture (New York, United States)
Details
- Title MISQUOTING JESUS
- Author EHRMAN,BART
- Binding Paperback
- Edition Reprint
- Condition Used - Fair
- Pages 272
- Volumes 1
- Language ENG
- Publisher HarperOne, New York, New York, U.S.A.
- Publication date 2007-02-06
- Illustrated Yes
- Features Bibliography, Illustrated, Index, Table of Contents
- Bookseller's Inventory # 9780060859510.u2
- ISBN 9780060859510 / 0060859512
- Weight 0.48 lbs (0.22 kg)
- Dimensions 7.95 x 5.25 x 0.6 in (20.19 x 13.34 x 1.52 cm)
-
Themes
- Religious Orientation: Christian
- Religious Orientation: Jewish
- Category Religion - Church History
- Dewey Decimal Code 225.486
- Quantity available 1
About Book Culture New York, United States
Biblio member since 2021
Book Culture is an independent bookstore located in Morningside Heights in Manhattan and Long Island City in Queens.
Summary
For almost 1,500 years, the New Testament manuscripts were copied by hand — — and mistakes and intentional changes abound in the competing manuscript versions. Religious and biblical scholar Bart Ehrman makes the provocative case that many of our widely held beliefs concerning the divinity of Jesus, the Trinity, and the divine origins of the Bible itself are the results of both intentional and accidental alterations by scribes. In this compelling and fascinating book, Ehrman shows where and why changes were made in our earliest surviving manuscripts, explaining for the first time how the many variations of our cherished biblical stories came to be, and why only certain versions of the stories qualify for publication in the Bibles we read today. Ehrman frames his account with personal reflections on how his study of the Greek manuscripts made him abandon his once ultra — conservative views of the Bible.
Reader reviews for MISQUOTING JESUS
Write a review for this book
Important Terms and Guidelines
- Please focus on the book’s content and context. Also, add any personal comments as to how you enjoyed the book. Substantiate your likes and dislikes. You may make comparisons to other books.
- Reviews must be at least 140 characters in length.
- Please do not reveal critical plot elements.
- This is not a help line. Contact customer support if you need help.
Your review must not include:
- Obscenities, discriminatory language, or other insulting language not suitable for public domain
- Advertisements, “spam” content, or references to other products, offers or websites.
- Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, physical addresses or other contact information.
- Overly critical comments about other reviews or reviewers
- Time-sensitive material (i.e. promotional tours, seminars, lectures, etc.)
- Availability, price, or alternative ordering/shipping information
First line
More than almost anything I've ever written about, the subject of this book has been on my mind for the past thirty years, since I was in my late teens and just beginning my study of the New Testament.
From the rear cover
For almost 1,500 years, the New Testament manuscripts were copied by hand--and mistakes and intentional changes abound in the competing manuscript versions. Religious and biblical scholar Bart Ehrman makes the provocative case that many of our widely held beliefs concerning the divinity of Jesus, the Trinity, and the divine origins of the Bible itself are the results of both intentional and accidental alterations by scribes.
In this compelling and fascinating book, Ehrman shows where and why changes were made in our earliest surviving manuscripts, explaining for the first time how the many variations of our cherished biblical stories came to be, and why only certain versions of the stories qualify for publication in the Bibles we read today. Ehrman frames his account with personal reflections on how his study of the Greek manuscripts made him abandon his once ultra-conservative views of the Bible.
Media reviews
Citations
- Time, 06/22/2009, Page 107
